Sponsor-Selected Deployment
Support deployment on sponsor-controlled servers or other selected infrastructure, subject to technical requirements. Define administration, access, and retention under the sponsor’s operating controls.
Regulated Industry Infrastructure
Coordinated Execution.
Controlled Information.
Documented Review.
GAME Plan coordinates work across sponsors, consultants, and service providers. Saga Agent supports task execution. Convergence assesses results against requirements. The architectural direction is sponsor-selected deployment, connections to approved AI services, and traceability across participating organizations.
Technology for Work Across Entities
GAME Plan maintains the common coordination record across participating organizations. Saga Agent and Convergence are being tested for assigned task execution and requirement assessment. Aregis coordinates network delivery; participants retain their assigned technical responsibilities, and qualified personnel retain responsibility for regulated decisions and acceptance.
Shared deliverables, dependencies, and acceptance criteria connect the work across entities. Source references, task activities, contributions, outstanding items, and review dispositions remain associated with the engagement.
AVAILABLE NOW
GAME Plan
Maintains the common engagement plan across sponsor personnel, consultants, and service providers. Records assigned responsibilities, dependencies, deliverable status, and references to supporting records.
- Defined deliverables, responsibilities, and schedules
- Dependency, issue, and decision tracking
- Supporting records and documented review dispositions
ACTIVE TESTING ON REAL PROJECTS
Saga Agent
Supports assigned task execution using authorized tools and source information. Testing evaluates performance, execution controls, and activity records within defined assignments, including work involving multiple participants. Qualified review precedes acceptance.
- Defined task scope and authorized inputs
- Recorded sources, actions, and results
- Review against task-specific acceptance criteria
ACTIVE TESTING ON REAL PROJECTS
Convergence
Supports assessment of submitted results against requirements and available evidence. Testing evaluates identification of gaps, conflicts, and unresolved findings to support documented review of participant deliverables.
- Requirement-to-result assessment
- Identification of evidence gaps and discrepancies
- Documented findings for reviewer disposition
Sponsor Control and Interoperable AI Services
The objective is for GAME Plan and Saga Agent to operate in sponsor-selected environments and connect participating organizations to approved AI providers and agent services. Shared coordination should support service choice while respecting each entity’s access permissions, information boundaries, and operating responsibilities.
AI as an Interchangeable Service
Connect compatible providers and agent services through defined interfaces, allowing AI capabilities to be selected or replaced without transferring ownership of the engagement record. Potential connections include Dot, Claude, ChatGPT Work, and Muse, subject to interface compatibility and adapter development.
Controlled Data Processing
Define the information each participant and service may access or process, approved destinations, and retention settings. Shared coordination does not imply unrestricted access to another entity’s records. Application hosting and external AI processing remain separate decisions.
Provenance Across the Workflow
Preserve connections among source identity and revision, task inputs, derived outputs, responsible participants, execution records, and review dispositions. Maintain traceability through authorized exchanges across organizations and services, with defined handling of transformations and provenance gaps.
Deployment options, adapters, agent connections, and provenance coverage remain subject to implementation and testing. This architectural vision does not establish current availability.
The standards effort develops common definitions for responsibilities, deliverables, evidence, and exchange across network participants. It is separate from product readiness.
Shared Specifications for Coordinated Work →Efficiency, Accuracy, and Reliability
Coordinated execution and documented review support more efficient preparation, consistent results, and earlier identification of gaps. Benefits are evaluated against an agreed baseline.
Execution Efficiency
Coordinate assignments, dependencies, source preparation, and review across participating organizations. Client-approved tools may assist with preparation and comparison, reducing information assembly and follow-up effort.
Accuracy and Technical Consistency
Support assessment of deliverables against controlled source records and specified requirements. Source references and documented discrepancies help qualified reviewers evaluate factual support, revision consistency, and unresolved inputs.
Process Reliability
Define execution responsibilities, review steps, acceptance criteria, and exception handling. Maintain outstanding items and review dispositions to support consistent execution across assignments and personnel.
Avoidable Quality Costs
Identify incomplete records and inconsistencies earlier, before they generate repeated review, document rework, or downstream remediation. Assess prevention and review effort alongside the quality costs the engagement seeks to avoid.
Deliverable Completeness
Specify required inputs and deliverable content before preparation. Record missing information and unresolved requirements so the reviewer can assess completeness within the agreed scope.
Audit and Submission Preparation
Maintain references to source records, revisions, review dispositions, and completion evidence during execution. Support efficient retrieval and assessment of the records needed for audits, submissions, and management review.
Applications in Regulated Work
Review the services and assignments these technologies are intended to support.
Regulatory submissions and writing, quality systems, auditing, investigations, program management, supplier oversight, and AI process implementation.
Task methods, controlled inputs, deliverables, review responsibilities, and evaluation criteria for selected assignments.
Data Access and Handling Controls
Each engagement establishes data-handling requirements based on the information involved, client procedures, and approved environment.
Data Minimization
Use the records needed for the task. Working copies preserve relevant facts and references to original records; redactions are documented.
Authorized Access and Providers
Define the personnel, participating organizations, systems, and AI services authorized to access or process each information category. Establish access permissions for shared work and restricted records.
Retention and Environment Requirements
Confirm provider settings, retention requirements, and access restrictions. Determine whether the intended use requires isolated infrastructure or a client-controlled environment.
Activity and Review Records
Retain source references, task activities, exceptions, review dispositions, and approvals under the engagement’s record requirements.
Product Readiness and Intended Use
Product readiness determines participation in an engagement; suitability for a regulated use requires assessment.
Available now
Expert-led engagements
Technical services and engagement management are available under defined scope, responsibilities, and acceptance criteria.
Available now
GAME Plan project management
Available for engagement planning, responsibilities, dependencies, deliverable status, and references to supporting records.
Active testing
Saga Agent
Task execution, source and activity records, controls, and practical performance are being evaluated on real projects.
Active testing
Convergence
Requirement assessment, evidence review, discrepancy identification, and reviewer support are being evaluated on real projects.
Technical requirements, data controls, and any required qualification or validation are established under applicable client procedures. Products in testing require a documented readiness assessment before standard availability.
Source Transparency and Network Licensing
The intended licensing model for Saga Agent and GAME Plan is the SagaHalla Network Source License (SNSL) v1.0. Authorized network participants can inspect, test, deploy, and adapt designated software within their approved scope, supporting shared technical development across independent entities.
Technical Review and Verification
Source access supports inspection of implementation details, testing, benchmarking, and verification for the intended use.
Controlled Deployment and Adaptation
Authorized members may operate and modify the software within their permitted environments and uses, supporting implementation under sponsor operating controls.
Shared Improvements and Protected Information
Production improvements generally contribute back to the network, with attribution retained for accepted contributions. This supports shared development without automatically requiring customer data, unrelated proprietary software, or protected confidential information.
SNSL is a source-available, membership-restricted license. Sponsor hosting requires appropriate network authorization or a separate commercial license. Applicable license terms govern each designated component.
Technology Partners
Aregis licenses technology for service delivery. These partners contribute software, assessment methods, and standards development. The proposed shared standard remains unpublished and has not been certified.
SagaHalla
Provides specifications and reference implementations, and is the lead licensing partner for the Saga Agent Architecture and GAME Plan Engine.
Norta DeSyCo
Contributes the methods behind Convergence for assessing results against requirements, drawing on research in cross-organizational collaboration and smart-contract systems.
PraSaga Foundation
Hosts the DAO SagaStandards Working Group and its process for reviewing contributed specifications.